The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-30118•United States of America v. Matthew Van Lith
12-30118Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMar 15, 2013
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MATTHEW VAN LITH,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-30118
D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00176-EJL-2
MEMORANDUM*
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KAILEY DOAN,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 12-30119
D.C. No. 3:11-cr-00176-EJL-1
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
Edward J. Lodge, District Judge, Presiding
FILED
MAR 15 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS
-- 1 of 2 --
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
2
Submitted March 5, 2013**
Seattle, Washington
Before: FERNANDEZ, W. FLETCHER, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.
Appellants Matthew Van Lith and Kailey Doan, who were convicted of
marijuana possession at an Idaho campground, challenge the district court’s denial
of their motions to suppress.
The district court properly denied the motions to suppress because, under the
totality of circumstances, the Bureau of Land Management ranger “had a
particularized and objective basis for suspecting” that Van Lith and Doan were
engaged in criminal activity. United States v. Basher, 629 F.3d 1161, 1165 (9th
Cir. 2011) (citation omitted).
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.