Michael W. Hudson v. TERRY BRIAN, Correctional Officer; ROBERT VOLKER, Correctional Officer

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
MICHAEL W. HUDSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TERRY BRIAN, Correctional Officer;
ROBERT VOLKER, Correctional Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 12-15283
D.C. No. 1:08-cv-00249-AWI-JLT
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
Anthony W. Ishii, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 12, 2013**
Before: PREGERSON, REINHARDT, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Michael W. Hudson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the
district court’s judgment following a jury verdict in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action
FILED
MAR 21 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-15283 2
alleging that defendants violated his First Amendment rights. We have jurisdiction
under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We dismiss.
We cannot review the district court’s judgment because Hudson has failed to
provide the relevant trial transcripts required to review the alleged errors. On May
10, 2012, this court denied Hudson’s request for production of transcripts at the
government’s expense without prejudice to renewal, accompanied by a showing as
to which portions of the transcript were necessary to decide the issues presented.
Hudson did not renew his motion. Accordingly, we are unable to review his
contentions challenging the district court’s evidentiary rulings and denial of
Hudson’s new trial motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)(2); Syncom Capital Corp. v.
Wade, 924 F.2d 167, 169 (9th Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (dismissing appeal by pro se
appellant for failure to provide relevant trial transcripts).
DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --