Noe Pineda De Leon v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
NOE PINEDA DE LEON,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 10-72343
Agency No. A029-174-738
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted April 16, 2013**
Before: CANBY, IKUTA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Noe Pineda De Leon, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions pro se for
review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for special rule cancellation
FILED
APR 22 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

10-72343 2
of removal under the Nicaraguan Adjustment and Central American Relief Act
(“NACARA”) and for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Pineda De
Leon is not eligible for special rule cancellation of removal under NACARA
Section 203. See Lanuza v. Holder, 597 F.3d 970, 972 (9th Cir. 2010) (per
curiam).
We also lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s determination that Pineda
De Leon failed to show exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his
qualifying relatives. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(B)(i); Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales,
424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th Cir. 2005).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --