United States of America v. Cirilo Orozco-Sanchez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CIRILO OROZCO-SANCHEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 11-10549
D.C. No. 4:10-cr-02302-RCC
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Raner C. Collins, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 10, 2013**
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Cirilo Orozco-Sanchez appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 63-month sentence for reentry after
deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), Orozco-Sanchez’s counsel has filed a brief stating there are no
FILED
JUN 13 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

11-10549 2
grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have
provided Orozco-Sanchez the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No
pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Orozco-Sanchez has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --