United States of America v. Juan Carlos Castillo-Lopez

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JUAN CARLOS CASTILLO-LOPEZ,
Defendant - Appellant.
Nos. 12-10192
12-10193
D.C. Nos. 2:12-cr-00072-FJM
2:07-cr-01409-FJM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Frederick J. Martone, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted June 10, 2013**
Before: HAWKINS, McKEOWN, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
In these consolidated appeals, Juan Carlos Castillo-Lopez appeals his
guilty-plea conviction and 24-month sentence for reentry of a removed alien, in
violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326; and the revocation of supervised release and
consecutive 15-month sentence imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v.
FILED
JUN 13 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

12-10192 & 12-10193 2
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Castillo-Lopez’s counsel has filed a brief stating
that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Castillo-Lopez the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Castillo-Lopez has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence,
and his right to appeal the revocation of supervised release and the sentence
imposed upon revocation. Our independent review of the record pursuant to
Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the
validity of the waiver. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.
2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --