Roberto Hernandez-Araiza v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General

06-74419Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 14, 2013

Full text

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent*
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision**
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ-ARAIZA,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 06-74419
Agency No. A072-291-332
ORDER*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 13, 2013**
Pasadena, California
Before: REINHARDT, RAWLINSON, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
In light of our opinion in Young v. Holder, 697 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2012) (en
banc), we remand this matter to the BIA to permit Hernandez-Araiza to provide
additional evidence supporting his contention that he was not convicted of a
controlled substances offense.
FILED
JUN 14 2013
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U .S. C OU R T OF APPE ALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2
A copy of this order, served on the agency, shall serve as the mandate of this
court.
REMANDED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.