The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-17274•Peter Halloran v. TODD THOMAS, Warden - Saguaro Correctional Center;
13-17274Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 16, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
PETER HALLORAN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TODD THOMAS, Warden - Saguaro
Correctional Center; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 13-17274
D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02443-SRB-JFM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 12, 2014**
Before: LEAVY, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiff Peter Halloran appeals pro se from the district court’s denial of his
request for preliminary injunctive relief. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §
1292(a)(1), and we affirm.
FILED
MAY 16 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
We express no view on the merits of the complaint. Our sole inquiry is
whether the district court abused its discretion in denying preliminary injunctive
relief, and we conclude the district court did not abuse its discretion. Winter v.
Natural Res. Def. Council Inc., 555 U.S. 7, 24 (2008) (listing factors for district
court to consider); Sports Form, Inc. v. United Press Int’l, 686 F.2d 750, 752-53
(9th Cir. 1982) (explaining limited scope of review).
AFFIRMED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.