The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-71551•Franklin Gross-Bravo v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
12-71551Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FRANKLIN GROSS-BRAVO,
Petitioner,
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 12-71551
Agency No. A035-687-550
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 13, 2014**
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Franklin Gross-Bravo, a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for protection under the
Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C.
FILED
MAY 20 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
§ 1252. See Alphonsus v. Holder, 705 F.3d 1031, 1036-37 (9th Cir. 2013);
Arteaga v. Mukasey, 511 F.3d 940, 942 n.1 (9th Cir. 2007). We review for
substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings, Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d
1182, 1184-85 (9th Cir. 2006), and we deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s denial of CAT relief because
Gross-Bravo failed to establish it is more likely than not that he would be tortured
by or with the consent or acquiescence of the government if returned to Nicaragua.
See Blandino-Medina v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1338, 1348 (9th Cir. 2013) (petitioner
failed to establish a clear probability of torture if returned to Nicaragua).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
2 12-71551
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.