The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
13-10324•United States of America v. Jacqueline Michelle White
13-10324Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 27, 2014
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JACQUELINE MICHELLE WHITE,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 13-10324
D.C. No. 4:11-cr-03815-JGZ
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Jennifer G. Zipps, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 13, 2014**
Before: CLIFTON, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Jacqueline Michelle White appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges her guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for possession with
intent to distribute marijuana, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(C).
Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), White’s counsel has filed a
FILED
MAY 27 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw
as counsel of record. We have provided White the opportunity to file a pro se
supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been
filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief on direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
13-10324 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.