Reza Nagahi v. California Employment Development Department;

11-17320Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJul 11, 2014

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
REZA NAGAHI,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; et al.,
Defendants - Appellees.
No. 11-17320
D.C. No. 5:07-cv-06268-JF
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Jeremy D. Fogel, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted February 10, 2014
San Francisco, California
Before: REINHARDT and THOMAS, Circuit Judges, and SESSIONS, District
Judge.**
The State defendants have advised the court that “[a]lthough this case has a
long and complex history, the result in this Court should be short and simple: a
FILED
JUL 11 2014
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable William K. Sessions III, District Judge for the U.S.
District Court for the District of Vermont, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

remand to the District Court so that Petitioner Reza Nagahi might be provided with
the two possible forms of relief to which he may be eligible: the appropriate
measure of Additional Trade Readjustment Allowance monetary benefits to which
he is entitled by statute, and a written notification regarding his application for
Remedial Education benefits.” Accordingly, we REVERSE and REMAND for
further proceedings in accordance with the above.
2

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.