The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-10273•United States of America v. Julio Ramirez-Galicia, a.k.a. Julio Gonzales Ramirez, a.k.a. Hector Ramirez, a.k.a.…
14-10273Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 29, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JULIO RAMIREZ-GALICIA, a.k.a. Julio
Gonzales Ramirez, a.k.a. Hector Ramirez,
a.k.a. Julio Ramirez-Gonzalez,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10273
D.C. No. 2:14-cr-00125-SRB
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
John A. Jarvey, District Judge, Presiding**
Submitted June 22, 2015***
Before: HAWKINS, GRABER, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.
Julio Ramirez-Galicia appeals from the district court’s judgment and
FILED
JUN 29 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The Honorable John A. Jarvey, Chief Judge of the United States
District Court for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 37-month sentence for reentry of a
removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), Ramirez-Galicia’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there
are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record.
We have provided Ramirez-Galicia the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Ramirez-Galicia has waived his right to appeal his conviction and sentence.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 80
(1988), discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver. See United
States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir. 2009). We accordingly dismiss
the appeal. See id. at 988.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
14-10273 2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.