United States of America v. Imran Ahmed Mir

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
IMRAN AHMED MIR,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10010
D.C. No. 2:12-cr-00141-JAM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of California
John A. Mendez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 14, 2015**
Before: SILVERMAN, BERZON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Imran Ahmed Mir appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges
the 108-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for
distribution of cocaine, methamphetamine, and heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C.
§ 841(a)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
FILED
OCT 21 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

Mir contends that the district court erred by determining that sentencing
entrapment is not a legal basis for an objection to a presentence report. The record
belies Mir’s contention that the court made this determination. Moreover, contrary
to Mir’s contention, the district court met its procedural obligations when it
considered and rejected Mir’s objections to the presentence report. See Fed. R.
Crim. P. 32(i)(3)(B).
AFFIRMED.
14-10010 2

-- 2 of 2 --