The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-10488•United States of America v. Hector Napoleon Santos, a.k.a. Hector Napoleon-Santos, a.k.a. Hector Napoleon Santos
14-10488Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 28, 2015
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
HECTOR NAPOLEON SANTOS, a.k.a.
Hector Napoleon-Santos, a.k.a. Hector
Napoleon Santos,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 14-10488
D.C. No. 4:14-cr-00741-RM-DTF-
1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
Rosemary Marquez, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted October 26, 2015**
Before: HUG, FARRIS, and CANBY, Circuit Judges.
Hector Napoleon Santos appeals from the district court’s judgment and
challenges his guilty-plea conviction and 43-month sentence for attempted illegal
re-entry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Pursuant to Anders v.
FILED
OCT 28 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Santos’s counsel has filed a brief stating that
there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of
record. We have provided Santos the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental
brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.
Santos has waived the right to appeal his conviction and sentence. Because
the record discloses no arguable issue as to the validity of the waiver, we dismiss
Santos’s appeal. See United States v. Watson, 582 F.3d 974, 986-88 (9th Cir.
2009).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
DISMISSED.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.