Sandra Winefred Folchi Godoy v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SANDRA WINEFRED FOLCHI
GODOY,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 13-70800
Agency No. A035-231-920
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted June 7, 2016**
Pasadena, California
Before: GOULD, MELLOY***, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Sandra Winefred Folchi Godoy petitions for review of the Board of
Immigration Appeals’ (BIA’s) summary affirmance without opinion of an
FILED
JUN 09 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
*** The Honorable Michael J. Melloy, Senior Circuit Judge for the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

Immigration Judge’s decision denying asylum, withholding of removal, and
Convention Against Torture relief. Godoy did not raise before the BIA any of the
issues she raises here. “[F]ailure to raise an issue in an appeal to the BIA
constitutes a failure to exhaust remedies with respect to that question and deprives
this court of jurisdiction to hear the matter.” Zara v. Ashcroft, 383 F.3d 927, 930
(9th Cir. 2004) (quoting Vargas v. U.S. Dep’t of Immigration & Naturalization,
831 F.2d 906, 907–08 (9th Cir. 1987)).
DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
2

-- 2 of 2 --