Catherine Quinola Palpal- Latoc v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CATHERINE QUINOLA PALPAL-
LATOC,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-72520
Agency No. A079-300-183
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Catherine Quinola Palpal-Latoc, a native and citizen of the Philippines,
petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
dismissing her appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying her
FILED
AUG 01 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

-- 1 of 2 --

applications for adjustment of status and a waiver under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(i). We
dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Palpal-Latoc’s contention that her due
process rights were violated by the IJ’s bias, because Palpal-Latoc did not raise this
contention in her brief to the BIA. See Tijani v. Holder, 628 F.3d 1071, 1080 (9th
Cir. 2010) (the court lacks jurisdiction to consider legal claims not presented in an
alien’s administrative proceedings before the agency).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
14-72520 2

-- 2 of 2 --