The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
14-73900•Jose Gilberto Torres v. LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General
14-73900Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 3, 2016
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE GILBERTO TORRES,
Petitioner,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-73900
Agency No. A070-941-811
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted July 26, 2016**
Before: SCHROEDER, CANBY, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Jose Gilberto Torres, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions for review
of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an
immigration judge’s decision denying his application for asylum and withholding
of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
AUG 3 2016
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 14-73900
substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings. Wakkary v. Holder, 558 F.3d
1049, 1056 (9th Cir. 2009). We deny the petition for review.
Substantial evidence supports the agency’s determination that Torres failed
to establish a well-founded fear of future persecution from gang members on
account of a protected ground. See INS v. Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483
(1992). We reject Torres’ contentions that the agency applied an incorrect legal
standard, or otherwise erred in analyzing his case. Thus, his asylum and
withholding of removal claims fail. See Zetino v. Holder, 622 F.3d 1007, 1011
(9th Cir. 2010).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.