Li Qiang Cheng v. JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LI QIANG CHENG,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III,
Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 14-72211
Agency No. A099-538-847
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Argued and Submitted November 17, 2017
Pasadena, California
Before: KOZINSKI and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and GETTLEMAN,**
District Judge.
“We review the BIA’s findings of fact, including credibility findings, for
substantial evidence and uphold the BIA’s findings unless the evidence compels a
FILED
DEC 1 2017
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The Honorable Robert W. Gettleman, United States District Judge for
the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

-- 1 of 2 --

page 2
contrary result.” Cui v. Holder, 712 F.3d 1332, 1336 (9th Cir. 2013). Cheng has
presented no evidence that the I-213 form was inaccurate, see Espinoza v. INS, 45
F.3d 308, 310 (9th Cir. 1995), and has not exhausted his claim that the I-826 form
was improperly admitted. See Abebe v. Mukasey, 554 F.3d 1203, 1208 (9th Cir.
2009) (en banc). Nor has Cheng established that the immigration judge’s
credibility finding lacked support in the record: “[E]ven a petitioner’s minor
inconsistencies, when aggregated or when viewed in light of the total
circumstances, may undermine credibility.” Shrestha v. Holder, 590 F.3d 1034,
1043 n.4 (9th Cir. 2010).
PETITION DENIED.

-- 2 of 2 --