James Weismann v. CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., a corporation; DOES, 1 to 100

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JAMES WEISMANN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., a
corporation; DOES, 1 to 100,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 16-56775
D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00203-GPC-BLM
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of California
Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 15, 2018**
Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
James Weismann appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment
dismissing his diversity action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of
foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAY 21 2018
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 16-56775
affirm.
In his opening brief, Weismann fails to address the district court’s grounds
for dismissal and has therefore waived his challenge to the district court’s order.
See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003)
(“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s
opening brief.”); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues
not supported by argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --