Joginder Singh v. WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOGINDER SINGH,
Petitioner,
v.
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,
Respondent.
No. 18-70948
Agency No. A075-722-264
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 12, 2019**
Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Joginder Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the
Board of Immigration Appeals’ order sustaining the Department of Homeland
Security’s appeal of the immigration judge’s decision granting Singh’s waiver of
inadmissibility under 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(1)(H). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8
U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 15 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-70948
We lack jurisdiction to review the agency’s discretionary denial of a waiver
of inadmissibility. See San Pedro v. Ashcroft, 395 F.3d 1156, 1157-58 (9th Cir.
2005). Singh has not alleged a colorable constitutional claim or question of law to
invoke our jurisdiction. See Martinez-Rosas v. Gonzales, 424 F.3d 926, 930 (9th
Cir. 2005) (“[T]raditional abuse of discretion challenges recast as alleged due
process violations do not constitute colorable constitutional claims that would
invoke our jurisdiction.”).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --