Stephen Kerr Eugster v. PAULA LITTLEWOOD, Executive Director, WSBA, in her official capacity;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEPHEN KERR EUGSTER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
PAULA LITTLEWOOD, Executive
Director, WSBA, in her official capacity; et
al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 18-35421
D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00392-TOR
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Eastern District of Washington
Thomas O. Rice, Chief Judge, Presiding
Submitted March 12, 2019**
Before: LEAVY, BEA, and N.R. SMITH, Circuit Judges.
Attorney Stephen Kerr Eugster appeals pro se from the district court’s
judgment dismissing his antitrust and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have
jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
MAR 19 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 18-35421
In his opening brief, Eugster fails to address any of the grounds for dismissal
and has therefore waived his challenge to the district court’s order. See Indep.
Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e will not
consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”);
Acosta–Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by
argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).
Eugster’s request for oral argument, set forth in his opening brief, is denied.
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --