The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-16302•Carlos Almeida v. CLARK E. DUCART, Warden
17-16302Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJun 12, 2019
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS ALMEIDA,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CLARK E. DUCART, Warden; R. BELL,
Assistant Warden; D. GONGORA; J.
BEESON, Special Agent; R. BURT,
Special Agent; B. NEAL, Counselor,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 17-16302
D.C. No. 3:16-cv-02689-JD
Northern District of California,
San Francisco
ORDER
Before: GRABER and BYBEE, Circuit Judges, and ARTERTON,* District Judge.
The mandate issued on May 16, 2019 is recalled, and the panel issues the
following changes to the memorandum disposition filed April 24, 2019:
Page 1, lines 1–2, replacing “pro se federal habeas petition” with “Section
1983 complaint”
Page 2, line 3, replacing “petition” with “complaint”
No further motions will be entertained in this case, and the mandate will be
reissued forthwith. The petition for panel rehearing, filed June 6, 2019, is
DENIED.
FILED
JUN 12 2019
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* The Honorable Janet Bond Arterton, United States District Judge for
the District of Connecticut, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.