The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
19-30200•United States v. 2020-04-10 | 19-30200 | USA V. VICTOR FOURSTAR, JR. | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |
19-30200Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApr 10, 2020
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
VICTOR CHARLES FOURSTAR, Jr.,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 19-30200
D.C. No. 4:02-cr-00052-DLC-1
MEMORANDUM
*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Montana
Dana L. Christensen, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted April 7, 2020
**
Before: TASHIMA, BYBEE, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
Victor Charles Fourstar, Jr., appeals from the revocation of supervised
release and the 6-month sentence and 33-month term of supervised release
imposed upon revocation. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967),
Fourstar’s counsel has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along
*
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
**
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
APR 10 2020
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 19-30200
with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Fourstar has filed a pro se
supplemental brief. No answering brief has been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80 (1988), discloses no arguable grounds for relief in this direct appeal.
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Fourstar’s pro se motion to
substitute counsel is DENIED.
AFFIRMED.
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.