United States v. 2020-11-04 | 13-70415 | QUAN JIN V. WILLIAM BARR | nonprecedential | memorandum disposition |

13-70415Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 4, 2020

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

QUAN BIN JIN,

Petitioner,

v.

WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General,

Respondent.

No. 13-70415

Agency No. A087-957-040

ORDER

On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted October 11, 2018
*

Honolulu, Hawaii

Before: WARDLAW, BERZON, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

The panel has voted to grant Jin’s petition for panel rehearing in light of this
court’s en banc decision in Torres v. Barr, No. 13-70653, 2020 WL 5668478 (9th
Cir. Sept. 24, 2020) (en banc) (overruling Minto v. Sessions, 854 F.3d 619 (9th Cir.
2017)). The prior memorandum disposition (Dkt. 65) in this case is vacated. Jin’s
petition for rehearing en banc is denied as moot.

*
The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED

NOV 4 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

2
Jin’s petition for review of the order of the Board of Immigration Appeals is
remanded to the agency to determine in the first instance whether alternative
grounds for removability exist under 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(6).
The petition for panel rehearing is GRANTED and the case is
REMANDED for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.