William Jermaine Fletcher v. CORIZON HEALTH, INC., and employees;

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WILLIAM JERMAINE FLETCHER,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
CORIZON HEALTH, INC., and employees;
et al.,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 20-35647
D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00532-BLW
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Idaho
B. Lynn Winmill, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted July 19, 2021**
Before: SCHROEDER, SILVERMAN, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Former Idaho state prisoner William Jermaine Fletcher appeals pro se from
the district court’s orders denying his post-judgment motions to reopen his 42
U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging inadequate dental care. We have jurisdiction under
28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for an abuse of discretion the denial of a motion
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JUL 28 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 20-35647
under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Sch. Dist. No. 1J, Multnomah
County, Or. v. ACandS, Inc., 5 F.3d 1255, 1262 (9th Cir. 1993). We affirm.
The district court did not abuse its discretion by denying Fletcher’s post-
judgment motions to reopen because Fletcher failed to establish any grounds for
relief. See id. at 1262-63 (setting forth factors for reconsideration and relief from
judgment under Rule 60(b)).
AFFIRMED.

-- 2 of 2 --