The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
21-55054•Lisa Vargas v. Nikolis Perez, an individual; JONATHAN ROJAS, an individual
21-55054Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNov 30, 2021
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LISA VARGAS,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
NIKOLIS PEREZ, an individual;
JONATHAN ROJAS, an individual,
Defendants-Appellants,
and
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, a
governmental entity; DOES, 1 to 10,
inclusive,
Defendants.
No. 21-55054
D.C. No.
2:19-cv-03279-PSG-AS
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Central District of California
Philip S. Gutierrez, Chief District Judge, Presiding
Submitted November 18, 2021**
Pasadena, California
FILED
NOV 30 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
-- 1 of 2 --
Before: LINN,*** BYBEE, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.
When an interlocutory appeal challenges the district court’s determination
that there is sufficient evidence to create a genuine dispute as to material fact, we
lack appellate jurisdiction. Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726 (9th Cir.
2021). Because appellants’ appeal amounts to a challenge to the district court’s
decision on the facts, we lack jurisdiction.
DISMISSED.
*** The Honorable Richard Linn, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation.
2
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.