Jose Abraham Marmol Bernabe v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General

19-72156Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJan 26, 2022

Full text

NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOSE ABRAHAM MARMOL BERNABE,
Petitioner,
v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney
General,
Respondent.
No. 19-72156
Agency No. A029-217-336
MEMORANDUM*
On Petition for Review of an Order of the
Immigration Judge
Submitted January 19, 2022**
Before: SILVERMAN, CLIFTON, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.
Jose Abraham Marmol Bernabe, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions for review of an immigration judge’s order affirming an asylum officer’s
negative credible fear determination issued in expedited removal proceedings. Our
jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We dismiss the petition for review.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
JAN 26 2022
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

-- 1 of 2 --

2 19-72156
We generally lack jurisdiction to review expedited removal proceedings,
including the determination that Marmol Bernabe did not establish a credible fear
of persecution or torture. See 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A)(iii) (“[N]o court shall have
jurisdiction to review” determinations made under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1)(B));
Guerrier v. Garland, 18 F.4th 304, 312-13 (9th Cir. 2021) (holding there is no
“colorable constitutional claims” exception to the limits 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(2)(A)
places on this court’s review of expedited removal proceedings).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.