The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-16365•Shawn Tyrone Percy v. United States of America
17-16365Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFeb 22, 2023
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SHAWN TYRONE PERCY,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 17-16365
D.C. Nos. 2:16-cv-02066-DGC
2:98-cr-00873-DGC-1
MEMORANDUM*
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of Arizona
David G. Campbell, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted February 14, 2023**
Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
Shawn Tyrone Percy appeals from the district court’s judgment denying his
28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate his conviction under 18 U.S.C.
§ 924(c)(1)(A)(iii) for discharging a firearm during the commission of a crime of
violence. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), Percy’s counsel
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
FILED
FEB 22 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-- 1 of 2 --
2 17-16365
has filed a brief stating that there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to
withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided Percy the opportunity to file a
pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has
been filed.
Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S.
75, 80-81 (1988), discloses that the certified issue provides no basis for appellate
relief. See Graves v. McEwen, 731 F.3d 876, 880-81 (9th Cir. 2013); see also
United States v. Begay, 33 F.4th 1081, 1093-96 (9th Cir.) (en banc), cert. denied,
143 S. Ct. 340 (2022).
Counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED.
AFFIRMED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.