The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
10-15222•United States v. 2012-10-30 | 10-15222 | Alexis Degelmann V. Advanced Medical Optics Inc. |…
10-15222Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOct 30, 2012
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ALEXIS DEGELMANN and JOSEPH No. 10-15222
LIN, on behalf of themselves and D.C. No. all those similarly situated, 4:07-cv-03107-PJH Plaintiffs-Appellants, Northern District of v. California,
ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS INC., a Oakland
Delaware corporation, ORDERDefendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Northern District of California
Phyllis J. Hamilton, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted
April 11, 2011—San Francisco, California
Filed October 30, 2012
Before: John T. Noonan and N. Randy Smith,
Circuit Judges, and Raner C. Collins, District Judge.*
COUNSEL
Jahan C. Sagafi, San Francisco, California, for the plaintiffs-
appellants.
Ben D. Whitwell, San Francisco, California, for the
defendant-appellee.
*The Honorable Raner C. Collins, District Judge for the U.S. District
Court for Arizona, sitting by designation.
13029
-- 1 of 4 --
ORDER
Pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), this appeal is hereby
DISMISSED. Each party shall pay its own costs and fees of
this appeal. A certified copy of this order served on the dis-
trict court shall constitute the mandate. The prior panel opin-
ion is VACATED.
13030 DEGELMANN v. ADVANCED MEDICAL OPTICS
-- 2 of 4 --
-- 3 of 4 --
PRINTED FOR
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS
BY THOMSON REUTERS—SAN FRANCISCO
The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted
© 2012 Thomson Reuters.
-- 4 of 4 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.