United States v. 2015-03-26 | 10-56971 | EDWARD PERUTA V. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO | precedential | opinion |

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
EDWARD PERUTA; MICHELLE
LAXSON; JAMES DODD; LESLIE
BUNCHER, DR.; MARK CLEARY;
CALIFORNIA RIFLE AND PISTOL
ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
Intervenor-Pending,
v.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO; WILLIAM D.
GORE, individually and in his
capacity as Sheriff,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 10-56971
D.C. No.
3:09-cv-02371-
IEG-BGS
ORDER
Field March 26, 2015
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35-3. The three-judge panel opinion and order denying

-- 1 of 2 --

PERUTA V. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO 2
motions to intervene shall not be cited as precedent by or to
any court of the Ninth Circuit.

-- 2 of 2 --