The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
12-55307•Steven Pelesasa Fue v. MARTIN BITER, Warden
12-55307Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 4, 2016
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
STEVEN PELESASA FUE,
Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
MARTIN BITER, Warden,
Respondent-Appellee.
No. 12-55307
D.C. No.
2:11-cv-02436-DMG-MRW
ORDER
Filed August 4, 2016
ORDER
THOMAS, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges,
it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to
Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a) and Circuit Rule
35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as
precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
-- 1 of 1 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.