The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
17-16980•Louis Taylor, a single man v. County of Pima, a body politic; CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic
17-16980Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAug 14, 2019
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
LOUIS TAYLOR, a single man,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
COUNTY OF PIMA, a body politic;
CITY OF TUCSON, a body politic,
Defendants-Appellants.
No. 17-16980
D.C. No.
4:15-cv-00152-RM
ORDER
Filed August 14, 2019
Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Eugene E. Siler,*
and Susan P. Graber, Circuit Judges.
Order
* The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation.
-- 1 of 2 --
TAYLOR V. COUNTY OF PIMA 2
ORDER
Judges Siler and Graber voted to deny the petitions for
panel rehearing. Judge Schroeder voted to grant the petitions
for panel rehearing. Judge Graber voted to deny the petitions
for rehearing en banc, and Judge Siler so recommended.
Judge Schroeder recommended granting the petitions for
rehearing en banc.
The full court has been advised of the petitions for
rehearing en banc. A judge of the court requested a vote on
en banc rehearing. The matter failed to receive a majority of
votes of non-recused active judges in favor of en banc
consideration. Fed. R. App. P. 35(f).
Judge Hurwitz did not participate in the deliberations or
vote in this case.
The petitions for panel rehearing and the petitions for
rehearing en banc are DENIED.
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.