Trina Ray , individually, and on behalf of others similarly situated v. County of Los Angeles

FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TRINA R AY , individually, and on
behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
C OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 17-56581
D.C. No.
2:17-cv-04239-
PA-SK
TRINA R AY ; S ASHA WALKER ,
individually, and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
LOS ANGELES C OUNTY D EPARTMENT
OF P UBLIC S OCIAL S ERVICES ,
Erroneously Sued As County of Los
Angeles,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 18-55276
D.C. No.
2:17-cv-04239-
PA-SK
ORDER
Filed October 8, 2019

-- 1 of 2 --

2 R AY V . C OUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
Before: Kim McLane Wardlaw and Mark J. Bennett,
Circuit Judges, and Kathleen Cardone,* District Judge.
Order
ORDER
The opinion filed on August 22, 2019 is amended as
follows:
On page six of the opinion, in the paragraph beginning
“As employers of the homecare providers,” replace <As
employers of the homecare providers, the State and County>
with <Assuming, without deciding, the State and County are
employers of the homecare providers, they>.
With this amendment, the panel votes to deny the
appellant’s petition for panel rehearing. [Dkt. 51] Judges
Wardlaw and Bennett vote to deny the appellant’s petition
for rehearing en banc [DKT No. 51], and Judge Cardone so
recommends. The full court has been advised of the petition
for rehearing en banc, and no active judge has requested a
vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. Fed. R. App.
P. 35. The petition for panel rehearing and rehearing en banc
is therefore DENIED. No further petitions for panel or en
banc rehearing shall be permitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
* The Honorable Kathleen Cardone, United States District Judge for
the Western District of Texas, sitting by designation.

-- 2 of 2 --