U.S. v. Jacinto — modified by order

20-0359/NA (modified by order)Armfor

Full text

United States Court of Appeals
for the Armed Forces
Washington, D.C.
United States,
Appellee
v.
Salvador
Jacinto,
Appellant
USCA Dkt. No. 20-0359/NA
Crim.App. No. 201800325
O R D E R
On consideration of Appellant’s and Appellee’s motion to file petitions for
reconsideration of this Court’s decision, United States v. Jacinto, 81 M.J. __,
(C.A.A.F. July 15, 2021), and the motion from Protect Our Defenders as amicus
curiae filed in support of Appellee’s petition for reconsideration, it is, by the
Court, this 26th day of August, 2021,
ORDERED:
That the motion of Protect Our Defenders to file an amicus curiae
memorandum is denied;
That Appellee’s petition for reconsideration is denied;
That Appellant’s petition for reconsideration is denied in part and granted in
part; and, that pursuant to the granted portion:
08/26/2021
U.S. v. Jacinto, Dkt. No. 20-0359/NA
2
That footnote 13 of the subject opinion is hereby modified to read, “Because
of the standard of review, any medical or psychiatric records that were generated
after the convening authority’s action are not relevant for appellate review of the
granted issues.”
For the Court,
/s/ David A. Anderson
Acting Clerk of the Court
cc: The Judge Advocate General of the Navy
Appellate Defense Counsel (Wester)
Appellate Government Counsel (Wiggins)
Amicus Curiae (Coote)

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.