20-0359/NA (modified by order)•U.S. v. Jacinto — modified by order
Full text
United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Washington, D.C. United States, Appellee v. Salvador Jacinto, Appellant USCA Dkt. No. 20-0359/NA Crim.App. No. 201800325 O R D E R On consideration of Appellant’s and Appellee’s motion to file petitions for reconsideration of this Court’s decision, United States v. Jacinto, 81 M.J. __, (C.A.A.F. July 15, 2021), and the motion from Protect Our Defenders as amicus curiae filed in support of Appellee’s petition for reconsideration, it is, by the Court, this 26th day of August, 2021, ORDERED: That the motion of Protect Our Defenders to file an amicus curiae memorandum is denied; That Appellee’s petition for reconsideration is denied; That Appellant’s petition for reconsideration is denied in part and granted in part; and, that pursuant to the granted portion: 08/26/2021
U.S. v. Jacinto, Dkt. No. 20-0359/NA 2 That footnote 13 of the subject opinion is hereby modified to read, “Because of the standard of review, any medical or psychiatric records that were generated after the convening authority’s action are not relevant for appellate review of the granted issues.” For the Court, /s/ David A. Anderson Acting Clerk of the Court cc: The Judge Advocate General of the Navy Appellate Defense Counsel (Wester) Appellate Government Counsel (Wiggins) Amicus Curiae (Coote)
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.