Noyes v. University Realty, Inc.

CourtListener 3327481ConnappctFeb 8, 1984

Full text

Per Curiam.

The appellant did not appear to argue this appeal on the date the case was assigned for hearing. Subsequently, a motion to reargue was denied by the court because we were not persuaded that the reasons given for the appellant’s absence warranted reargument.

Furthermore, a review of the record and briefs indicates that there was no error.

There is no error.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.