Schaeffer v. Schaeffer

CourtListener 7904434ConnappctJun 30, 1988

Full text

Per Curiam.
We have carefully examined the records, transcripts and briefs submitted to us on this appeal. After affording the plaintiff’s claims of error the appropriate scope of review, to the extent that they have been properly presented, we conclude that the trial court correctly applied the law to the evidence. We cannot retry the case. Stiepel v. Cone, 14 Conn. App. 815, 541 A.2d 547 (1988).

There is no error.

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.