CourtListener 10352147•Smith v. State
Full text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
MICAH SMITH, §
§
Defendant Below, § No. 193, 2024
Appellant, §
§ Court Below—Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1512004476 (N)
§
Appellee. §
§
Submitted: January 2, 2025
Decided: March 6, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the State’s motion to
affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that the judgment below should be
affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its April
20, 2024 order denying the appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief.1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura
Justice
1
State v. Smith, 2024 WL 1907282 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2024).
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.