CourtListener 10632564•The Seafarers Pension Plan v. Brian T. Moynihan
Full text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
THE SEAFARERS PENSION PLAN, §
derivatively on behalf of BANK OF § No. 468, 2024
AMERICA CORPORATION and BANK OF §
AMERICA, N.A., § Court Below–Court of
§ Chancery of the State
Plaintiff Below/Appellant, § of Delaware
§
v. § C.A No. 2023-0787
§
BRIAN T. MOYNIHAN, LIONEL L. §
NOWELL III, SHARON L. ALLEN, JOSÉ §
E. ALMEIDA, FRANK P. BRAMBLE, SR., §
PIERRE J. P. DE WECK, ARNOLD W. §
DONALD, LINDA P. HUSON, MONICA C. §
LOZANO, DENISE L. RAMOS, §
CLAYTON S. ROSE, MICHAEL D. §
WHITE, THOMAS D. WOODS, MARIA T. §
ZUBER, JACK O. BOVENDER, JR., §
SUSAN S. BIES, THOMAS J. MAY, R. §
DAVID YOST, ALASTAIR BORTHWICK, §
GEOFFREY S. GREENER, LAUREN §
MOGENSEN, DEAN C. ATHANASIA, §
PAUL M. DONOFRIO, and THOMAS K. §
MONTAG, §
§
Defendants Below/Appellees, §
§
and §
§
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION and §
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., §
§
Nominal Defendants Below/Appellees. §
Submitted: June 18, 2025
Decided: July 14, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW, and
GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting the Court en Banc.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal, and
following oral argument, we find it evident that the judgment below should be
affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the Court of Chancery’s
telephonic ruling on defendants’ motion to dismiss dated October 11, 2024.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of
Chancery is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths
Justice
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.