Furey v. Salaam

CourtListener 10729640DelOct 31, 2025

Full text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JUSTIN FUREY, §
§ No. 528, 2024
Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below—Court of
§ Chancery of the State of
v. § Delaware
§
SAKEENAH SALAAM, § C.A. No. 2023-0252
§
Plaintiff Below, §
Appellee. §

Submitted: September 26, 2025
Decided: October 31, 2025

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.

ORDER

After considering the opening brief and the record below, we find it evident

that the Court of Chancery’s judgment should be affirmed on the basis of the court’s

December 2, 2024 order approving the Magistrate in Chancery’s final report dated

November 8, 2024. The appellant did not file exceptions to the Magistrate’s report

and therefore did not preserve any issues for review on appeal.1

1
See Cowan v. Furlow, 2024 WL 4362264, at *2 (Del. Sept. 30, 2024) (“This Court has long held
that substantive challenges to a Magistrate’s final report that are not raised in exceptions under
Court of Chancery Rule 144 are not preserved for review on appeal to this Court.”).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that judgment of the Court of

Chancery is AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths
Justice

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.