CourtListener 10742054•Hudson v. State
Full text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WILLIAM HUDSON, §
§ No. 262, 2025
Defendant Below, §
Appellant, § Court Below–Superior Court
§ of the State of Delaware
v. §
§ Cr. ID No. 1104009274 (N)
STATE OF DELAWARE, §
§
Appellee. §
Submitted: September 22, 2025
Decided: November 24, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; LEGROW and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After consideration of the appellant’s opening brief, the appellee’s motion to
affirm, and the record on appeal, we find it evident that the judgment below should
be affirmed on the basis of and for the reasons stated in the commissioner’s April
30, 2025 report recommending that the Superior Court summarily dismiss the
appellant’s second motion for postconviction relief, which the Superior Court
adopted in its entirety on June 6, 2025.1
1
State v. Hudson, 2025 WL 1251317 (Del. Super. Ct. Apr. 30, 2025) (commissioner’s report and
recommendation).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the State’s motion to affirm is
GRANTED and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ N. Christopher Griffiths
Justice
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.