CourtListener 10767652•Ushler v. State
Full text
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
WILLIAM R. USHLER, §
§
Defendant Below, § No. 327, 2025
Appellant, §
§ Court Below—Superior Court
v. § of the State of Delaware
§
STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 2204009600 (N)
§
Appellee. §
Submitted: November 5, 2025
Decided: December 30, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and TRAYNOR, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the appellant’s opening brief and motion for
recusal, the appellee’s motion to affirm, and the record on appeal, we conclude that
the judgment below should be affirmed on the basis of the Superior Court’s order,
dated July 9, 2025, denying the appellant’s first motion for postconviction relief
under Superior Court Criminal Rule 61.1 The appellant’s motion to recuse a deputy
attorney general who did not file or appear on the appellee’s motion to affirm is
moot.
1
State v. Ushler, 2025 WL 1898104 (Del. Super. Ct. July 9, 2025).
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that motion to affirm is GRANTED
and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED. The motion for recusal is
moot.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Karen L. Valihura
Justice
2
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.