Fortiline, Inc.,et al. v. Hayne McCall

CourtListener 10786582DelFeb 10, 2026

Full text

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

FORTILINE, INC. and PATRIOT §
SUPPLY HOLDINGS, INC. §
§ No. 300, 2025
Plaintiffs Below, §
Appellants, § Court Below—Court of Chancery
§ of the State of Delaware
v. §
§ C.A. No. 2024-0211
HAYNE MCCALL, CHRISTOPHER §
ANTOS, BRUCE ROBERTS, §
JEFFREY T. JENKINS, SIDNEY C. §
PETERSON III, CLIFFORD §
SPAHN, JAMES R. COOK, JR., §
TIMOTHY L. VANEGMOND, §
ALAN HIBBARD, DAVID S. §
HORN, DAVID T. MCLEAN, §
DAVID W. KING, E. TODD §
O’TUEL, GREGOY F. WEINGART, §
GREGORY MCCLELLAND, JR., §
JASON A. WEISER, JOHN C. §
WEST, LEMUEL MAZA and §
SEAN P. STILLEY, §
§
Defendants Below, §
Appellees. §

Submitted: January 28, 2026
Decided: February 10, 2026

Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA, TRAYNOR, LEGROW and
GRIFFITHS, Justices, constituting the Court en banc.

ORDER

This 10th day of February, 2026, after consideration of the parties’ briefs, the

argument of counsel, and the record on appeal, it appears to the Court that the
judgment of the Court of Chancery should be affirmed on the basis of and for the

reasons stated in its memorandum opinion dated June 27, 2025.1

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the judgment of the Court of

Chancery be AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Gary F. Traynor
Justice

1
Fortiline, Inc. v. McCall, 341 A.3d 1027 (Del. Ch. June 27, 2025).
2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.