State v. LaCombe

CourtListener 10121057DelsuperctSep 18, 2024

Full text

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

STATE OF DELAWARE, )
)
v. ) ID No. 1201018188
)
CLAUDE LACOMBE, )
)
Defendant. )

Submitted: September 12, 2024
Decided: September 18, 2024

ORDER

1. On this 18th day of September, 2024, upon consideration of the Superior

Court Commissioner’s Report and Recommendations,1 Defendant Claude

LaCombe’s (“Defendant”) pro se Motion for Postconviction Relief and Motion for

Correction of an Illegal Sentence (collectively, the “Motions”)2 made pursuant to

Superior Court Criminal Rule 61, and the record in this case, it appears to the Court

that:

2. On May 10, 2024, Defendant filed the instant Motion for Postconviction

Relief. 3 Also on May 10, 2024, Defendant filed the instant Motion for Correction

of an Illegal Sentence. 4 The Motions were referred to the Commissioner pursuant

to 10 Del. C. § 512(b) and Rule 62 for proposed findings of fact and conclusions of

1
D.I. 144.
2
D.I.s 138, 139.
3
D.I. 138.
4
D.I. 139.
law. On August 29, 2024, the Commissioner issued a Report and Recommendation

in which she recommended that the Court summarily dismiss Defendant’s Motion

for Postconviction Relief as procedurally barred and deny the Motion for Correction

of an Illegal Sentence. 5

3. A party can file and serve written objections to a Commissioner’s order

“[w]ithin ten days after filing of a Commissioner’s proposed findings of fact and

recommendations.” 6 Neither party filed and served an objection on or before

September 12, 2024, ten days after the Commissioner filed her Report and

Recommendations.

4. The Court adopts the Commissioner’s Report and Recommendations in

their entirety for the reasons set forth therein. The Commissioner’s findings are not

clearly erroneous, contrary to law, or an abuse of discretion.7 Accordingly, the

Motions are hereby DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________
Sheldon K. Rennie, Judge

Original to Prothonotary

cc: Claude LaCombe (SBI #00552189)

5
D.I. 144.
6
Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(5)(ii).
7
Super. Ct. Crim. R. 62(a)(4)(iv).

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.