Melvin v. Centurion of Delaware, LLC

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

CHARLES L. MELVIN, )
)
Plaintiff, )
) C.A. No.: K24C-09-024 RLG
v. )
)
CENTURION OF DELAWARE, )
LLC., BAYHEALTH MEDICAL )
CENTER, INC., AND VITALCORE )
HEALTH STRATEGIES, LLC, )
)
Defendants. )

Submitted: December 23, 2024
Decided: January 31, 2025

ORDER

Upon Review of the Affidavit of Merit – COMPLIANT

This matter involves a medical negligence suit filed by Plaintiff Charles L.

Melvin against Defendants Centurion of Delaware, LLC. (“Centurion”); Bayhealth

Medical Center, Inc. (“Bayhealth”); and Vitalcore Health Strategies, LLC.

(“Vitalcore”). Mr. Melvin asserts Defendants’ collective medical negligence caused

him permanent injury to his leg. Additionally, Mr. Melvin alleges Bayhealth’s

specific negligence caused a delay in diagnosis, further retarding Mr. Melvin’s

necessary treatment.

1
Defendants Centurion and BayHealth move for an in camera review of

Plaintiff’s Affidavit of Merit to determine whether it complies with the requirement

of 18 Del. C. §§ 6853(a)(1) and (c). Plaintiff filed an expert’s affidavit and the

expert’s curriculum vitae in this case. The Court performed the review requested.

In Delaware, a medical negligence lawsuit must be filed with an affidavit of

merit as to each defendant, signed by an expert, and accompanied by the expert’s

curriculum vitae.1 As a general matter, an affidavit that track’s the statutory

language complies with the statute.2 The expert signing the affidavit must be

licensed to practice medicine as of the date of the affidavit, and engaged in practice

in the same or similar field of medicine as the defendant in the three years

immediately preceding the alleged negligence.3 The affidavit must also recite that

reasonable grounds exist to believe that each defendant was negligent in a way that

caused the plaintiff’s injuries.4 While the affidavit of merit must be filed under seal,

a defendant may request the Court to review it in camera to ensure that it complies

with the statute’s requirements.5

1
Flamer v. Nanticoke Memorial Hospital, 2020 WL 113911, at *1 (Del. Super. Jan 9, 2020)
(quoting 18 Del. C. § 6853(a)(1) & (c)).
2
Dishmon v. Fucci, 32 A.2d 338, 342 (Del. 2011).
3
Flamer, 2020 WL 113911, at *1 (quoting § 6853(c)).
4
Id.
5
Id. at *1 (quoting § 6853(d)).
2
As requested, after an in camera review of the Affidavit of Merit and the

expert witness’s curriculum vitae, the Court finds:

1. The expert signed the affidavit.

2. The expert attached a current curriculum vitae.

3. The expert is currently licensed to practice medicine.

4. The expert has been treating patients in the same field of medicine as

Defendants for over three years, including the three years immediately

preceding the alleged negligent conduct. Namely, the affidavit and

accompanying curriculum vitae specifically reference the expert’s

experience in the field of internal medicine. The expert possesses

familiarity with the specific medical conditions Mr. Melvin

experienced; completed his residency in internal medicine; and holds

board certifications in internal medicine and addiction medicine. The

expert has also served as a clinical instructor in the Department of

Medicine at the University of Medicine & Dentistry of New Jersey.

5. The expert recites and specifically lists the grounds and reasons to

believe that BayHealth breached the applicable standard of care as it

related to the diagnosis and treatment of Plaintiff’s condition. The

expert further opines that the breach was a proximate cause of

Plaintiff’s pain, suffering, and need for additional treatment.

3
6. The expert also explicitly renders opinions with regard to all three

Defendants. The expert outlines, in his estimation, the bases for the

belief that all Defendants breached the applicable standard of care as it

relates to the treatment of Plaintiff’s condition. The expert attributes

that breach as the proximate cause of Plaintiff’s permanent injury.

The Affidavit of Merit contains the information required by 18 Del. C. §§ 6853(a)(1)

and (c) as to the allegations involving all Defendants. Therefore, the affidavit of

merit is COMPLIANT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Via File & ServeXpress

4