Felton Sears v. State of Florida

CourtListener 10864874FladistctappMay 27, 2026

Full text

Third District Court of Appeal
State of Florida

Opinion filed May 27, 2026.
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D26-0792
Lower Tribunal No. F10-32949-A
________________

Felton Sears,
Appellant,

vs.

State of Florida,
Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from
the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Jason Bloch, Judge.

Felton Sears, in proper person.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, and Lourdes B. Fernandez,
Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and GORDO, JJ.

PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See State v. Iseley, 944 So. 2d 227, 231 (Fla. 2006) (“The

requisite ‘clear jury finding’ was made in this case. This jury’s finding that

Iseley was guilty of aggravated assault with a firearm as charged in the

information is consistent with both the language of the information and the

evidence adduced at trial. The information expressly charged that a firearm

was used during the commission of the aggravated assault. Our review of

the record establishes that the only deadly weapon involved in this case was

the firearm referenced in the information and that there was no dispute that

the weapon met the definition of a firearm. Consequently, we conclude that

because the verdict form contained an express reference to the use of a

firearm in the commission of the crime, the evidence supports that finding

required by section 775.087, and the verdict of guilt of aggravated assault

with a firearm constituted the clear jury finding necessary under our

precedent.”).

2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.