Carl Ingraham v. State of Florida

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA
FOURTH DISTRICT

CARL INGRAHAM,
Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.

No. 4D2025-0426

[June 3, 2026]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St.
Lucie County; Michael James Linn, Judge; L.T. Case No.
562017CF001431AXXXXX.

Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Siobhan Shea, Assistant Public
Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Pablo Ignacio
Tapia, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Appellant raises five issues on appeal arising from his convictions for
DUI manslaughter, vehicular homicide, and DUI causing serious bodily
injury following a fatal crash. With one exception, we affirm without
comment.

As to sentencing, the State properly concedes error regarding certain
costs because “a court’s oral pronouncement of a sentence controls over
the written sentencing document.” Williams v. State, 957 So. 2d 600, 603
(Fla. 2007). We therefore reverse and remand for correction of costs only.
We otherwise affirm.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

CIKLIN, GERBER and LOTT, JJ., concur.

* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.

2