CourtListener 10803050•TIMESHIE HOWELL v. KIMBERLY ASSOCIATES II, LP
Full text
Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________
March 03, 2026
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A26A1372. TIMESHIE HOWELL v. KIMBERLY ASSOCIATES II, LP et al.
This dispossessory action originated in magistrate court. After the court entered
a writ of possession, Timeshie Howell filed a petition for review to the state court.
The state court dismissed Howell’s petition for review for failure to pay rent into the
court registry. This direct appeal followed. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
Appeals from decisions of the state courts reviewing decisions of the magistrate
courts by de novo proceedings must be initiated by filing an application for
discretionary review. OCGA § 5-6-35(a)(11); Strachan v. Meritor Mtg. Corp. E., 216
Ga. App. 82, 82 (453 SE2d 119) (1995). “Compliance with the discretionary appeals
procedure is jurisdictional.” Smoak v. Dept. of Human Resources, 221 Ga. App. 257,
257 (471 SE2d 60) (1996). Howell’s failure to follow the proper procedure deprives
us of jurisdiction over this direct appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
03/03/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.