Christopher Houston v. Eric Dunaway, Judge

Court of Appeals
of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________
May 27, 2026

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A26O0012. CHRISTOPHER HOUSTON v. ERIC DUNAWAY, JUDGE.

Christopher Houston, who is facing criminal prosecution in Fulton County,
filed the instant extraordinary motion and supplemental brief in support of his
emergency writ of mandamus, seeking a stay of the trial proceedings in two underlying
criminal cases, an order compelling a ruling on a recusal affidavit, and an order
compelling the court clerk to update his status to “pro se.”1 However, Houston does
not demonstrate any basis for this Court to exercise its original jurisdiction.
“Generally, the superior courts of this state have the power, in proper cases, to
issue process in the nature of mandamus, prohibition, specific performance, quo
warranto, and injunction, and hence the need to resort to the appellate courts for such
relief by petition filed in the appellate courts will be extremely rare.” Brown v.
Johnson, 251 Ga. 436, 436 (306 SE2d 655) (1983); see also Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI,
Sec. I, Par. IV. As the Supreme Court recently made clear, an appellate court’s
authority to issue such writs “is connected only to such powers as necessary in aid of
its jurisdiction or to protect or effectuate its judgments. It does not grant jurisdiction
to this Court to issue process as an original matter wholly unconnected to its appellate
jurisdiction.” Arnold v. Alexander, 321 Ga. 330, 334(1) (914 SE2d 311) (2025)
(punctuation omitted). “[I]t will be an ‘extremely rare’ circumstance that would

1
Houston filed his motion and supplemental brief in the Supreme Court of
Georgia, which transferred it to this Court upon finding no basis for jurisdiction there.
See Case No. S26M1410 (May 12, 2026).
require a party to seek a writ of mandamus in [an appellate court] in the first instance,
given that superior court judges have the power to issue process in the nature of
mandamus against other superior court judges or trial court officials.” Id. at 335(1)
n.6.
Here, although Houston contends he filed a mandamus petition in the superior
court, he has not included a copy of the petition or a ruling. Houston did, however,
include a copy of a recusal order in a civil matter recusing all Fulton County judges as
to that matter and referring that civil matter to the 9th Judicial Administrative
District. The gist of Houston’s petition in this Court appears to be that this recusal
order in the civil matter precluded a Fulton County judge from accepting his plea in
the criminal matter, and he seeks a writ staying further proceedings in Fulton County
and issuing additional relief.2 According to Houston, he should not be required to file
a mandamus petition in Fulton County, which he contends would be useless in light
of the recusal in the civil matter.
Contrary to Houston’s contention, this is not one of the extremely rare
instances in which this Court is authorized to exercise its limited original jurisdiction.
Houston has not established that he filed a mandamus petition in superior court. And
Houston must first obtain a ruling from the superior court before we will exercise our
jurisdiction. See Brown, 251 Ga. at 436-37. Although Houston argues that filing a
mandamus in Fulton County would be useless, we presume the trial court will follow
the law. See Henderson v. State, 295 Ga. 333, 335(1)(b) (759 SE2d 827) (2014). Because

2
Under Uniform Superior Court Rule 25.3, when a judge is presented with a
recusal motion, “the judge shall temporarily cease to act upon the merits of the
matter[.]” This rule does not automatically require judges to cease acting upon other
matters unrelated to the case in which recusal was sought.
there is no basis for this Court to exercise its jurisdiction, Houston’s petition is hereby
DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________
05/27/2026
I certify that the above is a true extract from
the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court
hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.