2:25-cv-00192•LaGreca v. Davis et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS DELTA DIVISION VERSACE POOH LAGRECA PLAINTIFF ADC #103829 v. No: 2:25-cv-00192-JM BRANDON A. DAVIS; and MICHAEL MELLOW DEFENDANTS ORDER The Court has reviewed the Proposed Findings and Recommendation (RD) submitted by United States Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris. Mr. LaGreca did not file any objections to the RD. He did file an amended complaint (Doc. No. 4), but this amendment did not address the issues raised in the RD. He also filed a request for copies. (Doc. No. 5). After careful consideration, the Court concludes that the Proposed Findings and Recommendation should be, and hereby are, approved and adopted in their entirety as this Court’s findings in all respects. His request for copies will be granted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: 1. LaGreca’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED, and this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. His motion for copies (Doc. No. 5) is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to mail Mr. LaGreca copies of the following: the docket sheet in this case as well Doc. No. 4; in 1:11-cv- 00053-JLH (Waller v. Maples et al.), Doc. Nos. 20, 22-23; and in 5:19-cv-00181-KGB (Waller v. Felts et al.), Doc. Nos. 5-6. DATED this 23rd day of October, 2025. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 2:25-cv-00192-JM Document 6 Filed 10/23/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.