3:25-cv-00198•McCarty v. Department of Human Services
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS NORTHERN DIVISION LANA MCCARTY V. No. 3:25-cv-198-DPM PLAINTIFF DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES ORDER DEFENDANT The Court understands but denies Lana McCarty's motion to seal, Doc. 7. Insofar as practicable, this Court's business should be done in public. IDT Corp. v. eBay, 709 F.3d 1220, 1222-23 (8th Cir. 2013). Some sensitive information must be redacted prior to filing. Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a). McCarty and the Department of Human Services may also propose a protective order to keep private information confidential during discovery. But an understandable preference to keep all personal health matters private is insufficient to overcome the public's interest in open access to the Court's record. McCarty has put her health issues in dispute. But the Court and the parties should also strive to speak in general terms whenever possible. So Ordered. D.P. Marshall Jr. United States District Judge ueMe4 Case 3:25-cv-00198-DPM Document 8 Filed 10/27/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.