4:22-cv-00588•Payne et al v. Davis et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION REBECCA J. PAYNE, et al. PLAINTIFFS v. Case No. 4:22-cv-00588-KGB MICHAEL C. DAVIS, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER Before the Court is defendant Michael C. Davis’s unopposed motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 52) and defendants John Staley and Nathan Rice’s unopposed motion for extension of time (Dkt. No. 53). Motions for summary judgment were due in this matter on October 27, 2025 (Dkt. Nos. 52, ¶ 2; 53, ¶ 1). Counsel for Davis represents that more time is needed to file a motion for summary judgment due to other legal matters (Dkt. No. 52, ¶ 3). Counsel for Staley and Rice represents that more time is needed to complete their motion for summary judgment due to extensive litigation, travel commitments, and a bench trial on October 28, 2025 (Dkt. No. 53, ¶ 3). Davis, Staley, and Rice represent that opposing counsel has been contacted and has no objection to extending the time to file a motion for summary judgment to November 10, 2025 (Dkt. Nos. 52, ¶ 5; 53, ¶ 3). For good cause shown, the Court grants the parties’ joint motion to extend time (Dkt. Nos. 52, 53). The deadline for filing motions for summary judgment is extended to, and including, November 10, 2025. It is so ordered this 28th day of October, 2025. _______________________ Kristine G. Baker Chief United States District Judge Case 4:22-cv-00588-KGB Document 55 Filed 10/28/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.